mfrr logo

Aleksandar Vučić, President of Serbia

Ana Brnabić, Prime Minister of Serbia

 

CC: Officials members of the Working Group for the Security and Protection of Journalists:

Dejan Stojanović, Ministry of Culture, Head of the Working Group

Mladen Basic, Prime Minister’s Office

Ana Miletic, Prime Minister’s Office

Branko Stamenković, Deputy Public Prosecutor

Zoran Pašalić, Ombudsman

Nenad Stefanovic, President of the Association of Judges and Prosecutors 

Dejan Eraković, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Slobodan Malešić, Ministry of Interior Affairs 

Miroslav Gačević, Ministry for European Integration 

Jovan Ćosić, Ministry of Justice

 

CC:

Olivér Várhelyi, European Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement

Věra Jourová, European Commission, Vice-President for Values and Transparency

Sem Fabrizi, Ambassador and Head of Delegation of the European Union to Serbia

David Casa MEP and Ramona Strugariu MEP, Co-Chairs of European Parliament Media Working Group

Tanja Fajon MEP, Chair, European Parliament Delegation for relations with Serbia 

Vladimir Bilčik MEP, European Parliament Committee on Foreign Affairs Standing Rapporteur for Serbia

Dunja Mijatovic, Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights

Irene Khan, United Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of freedom of opinion and expression

Teresa Ribeiro, OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media

Jan Braathu, Ambassador and Head of OSCE Mission to Serbia

 

Sent electronically

 

24 March 2021

 

Dear President Vučić,

Dear Prime Minister Brnabić,

 

The Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) and partners are writing to condemn the lack of resolute government response to the smear campaign against independent news outlet KRIK. We reiterate our call on the Serbian authorities to take the necessary steps to put a stop to this ongoing threat against these and other independent outlets in Serbia, as well as to sanction such discrediting tactics and threats by all institutional means possible. This is more necessary now than ever, following reports that five of the nine non-state members of the Working Group for the Security and Protection of Journalists have stepped down from the group just three months after its establishment due to the state’s apparent unwillingness to engage with this important threat.

 

The MFRR and its partners have previously condemned the smear campaign and called for action to ensure the situation does not escalate. We pointed out that the publication of baseless claims linking KRIK to prominent criminals puts them at risk, and we stressed that pro-government media should not be used to further polarisation or to target independent outlets. We fear that, in a climate of endemic impunity for attacks against journalists, this smear campaign, if left unchecked, could invite further threats and acts of violence against KRIK and provide cover for police interference and persecution.

 

Instead of unequivocally defending journalists, the representatives of the ruling party SNS have continued to attack them. This has had significant implications for the Serbian Government’s commitment to media freedom and the protection of at-risk journalists and media workers. The Working Group, which was established to facilitate coordinated action between relevant state bodies and media outlets, journalist associations and unions to respond to emergent threats to journalists and media workers, can only function as intended when all parties contribute fully and state bodies commit to meaningful action. A breakdown represents not just a failure of the Working Group, but can also actively undermine the media’s trust in the state’s commitment to journalists’ safety and media freedom more broadly. 

 

The key findings of an MFRR fact-finding mission conducted in January and February 2021, led by ARTICLE 19 in cooperation with the Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia (NUNS), show alarming numbers of verbal and physical attacks and harassment against journalists often perpetrated by public authorities, in particular politicians and police. These threats are often followed by coordinated smear campaigns and online harassment. Accountability for these attacks is insufficient despite the existence of numerous mechanisms at governmental level aimed at enhancing the work of police and prosecutors to investigate violence against journalists and cooperate with media associations and journalists’ organisations.   

 

The decision of five organisations to step back from the Working Group should not be dismissed out of hand. Without their involvement, the legitimacy and efficacy of the Working Group can no longer be guaranteed. The Serbian Government should work to address all concerns in an open and transparent manner. As outlined in the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member States on the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and other media actors (CM/Rec(2016)4), any mechanism focused on the protection of journalists and media workers “should be subject to meaningful civil society oversight”. This oversight is now severely damaged, raising legitimate questions as to the ability of the Working Group to continue functioning as envisaged. 

 

We call on the Serbian authorities to meaningfully engage with journalists and media workers, journalists’ associations and unions, and civil society and to implement its commitments to improve the safety of journalists, media workers and outlets. This includes a full-throated high-level condemnation of the smear campaign against KRIK and other independent outlets in Serbia and immediately undertaking all necessary steps to stop and sanction these discrediting tactics and threats by all institutional means possible.

 

Signed:

 

ARTICLE 19

Committee to Protect Journalists 

European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)

European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)

Free Press Unlimited

International Press Institute (IPI)

OBC Transeuropa

Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP)

Reporters Without Borders (RSF)

South East Europe Media Organisation (SEEMO)

This letter has been written by the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries. This project provides legal and practical support, public advocacy and information to protect journalists and media workers. The MFRR is organised by a consortium led by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) including ARTICLE 19, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), Free Press Unlimited (FPU), the Institute for Applied Informatics at the University of Leipzig (InfAI), International Press Institute (IPI) and CCI/Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT). The project is co-funded by the European Commission.

Read news by categories:

Related news

Statement

Press Release: Decreasing Support for Journalists’ Protection will Undermine Media Freedom in Germany and Europe

The plan for the Saxony Budget 2025/2026 reduces financial support for the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) by two-thirds. This poses a significant threat to the stability of the only European civil society organisation operating within the state. The ECPMF acknowledges the difficulty of navigating a state budget amid economic uncertainty. However, in times when public interest journalism and democratic discourse are under severe pressure – facing economic constraints, pressures, disinformation campaigns, a reduced readership, and attacks from the far-right – a strong protection mechanism and unwavering support for press and media freedom in Saxony, Germany, and Europe is more important than ever.

READ MORE
Statement

Sachsenhaushalt: Schwindende Unterstützung für Medienschaffende schwächt Medienfreiheit in Deutschland und Europa

Der Entwurf des sächsischen Doppelhaushaltes 2025/2026 sieht eine Mittelkürzung von zwei Dritteln für das European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) vor. Sollte der Entwurf verabschiedet werden, stellt dies eine ernsthafte Bedrohung für die Stabilität und Zukunft der Organisation dar. Selbstverständlich sind Sparmaßnahmen angesichts der wirtschaftlichen Lage nachvollziehbar. Jedoch ist eine ungebrochene Unterstützung für den unabhängigen Journalismus gerade dann wichtig, wenn finanzielle Engpässe, Rechtspopulismus und Desinformation die Presse- und Medienfreiheit unter Druck setzen.

READ MORE
Feature

Feindbild Journalist:in 9: Pressefreiheit im Spannungsfeld gesellschaftlicher Krisen

Die neue Feindbild Journalist:in Studie zeigt: Mit 98 Angriffen ist die Gewalt gegen Medienschaffende in Deutschland auf Rekordniveau.

READ MORE
Feature

ECPMF’s take on the EU Democracy Shield: A call to prioritise media resilience and journalists’ protection

ECPMF calls for stronger protection of journalists and media sustainability under the EU Democracy Shield.

READ MORE
Statement

Greece: Total impunity persists on fourth anniversary of Giorgos Karaivaz murder

The international media freedom and journalist organisations today mark the fourth anniversary of the killing of Greek crime reporter Giorgos Karaivaz in April 2021 with a renewed call for justice and an end to ongoing impunity.

READ MORE
ECPMF

Lokaljournalismus unter Druck: Sicherheitsempfinden und Bedrohungserfahrungen von Lokaljournalist:innen in Sachsen und Thüringen

Eine neue Studie von BDZV und ECPMF zeigt: Lokaljournalist:innen in Sachsen und Thüringen sind zunehmend Bedrohungen ausgesetzt. Medienfeindlichkeit, Einschüchterung und strukturelle Herausforderungen gefährden die Pressefreiheit.

READ MORE
Tags :