Julian Assange Extradition
ECPMF calls on the UK to release Julian Assange and block his extradition

Gavin.Rea

30 September 2020

No Comments

Julian Assange Extradition

Julian Assange Extradition

ECPMF calls on the UK to release Assange and block his extradition, as the hearings enter the final stretch. We are gravely concerned about the implications of the US government’s indictment for investigative journalism.

 

The European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) is deeply concerned by the ongoing extradition proceedings brought against Julian Assange in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court. We reiterate our call on the UK Government to release him without further delay and to block his extradition to the US.

 

The US Government’s indictment of Assange represents the first-ever use of charges under the Espionage Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for the publication of truthful information in the public interest. The precedent established by this case could be damning, opening the door to criminalising the protection of journalist-source communications and the publication by journalists of classified information, activities that are a crucial and routine part of investigative journalism and vitally important in modern democracies.

 

Throughout the proceedings to date, Assange’s defence counsel with the help of witness testimony from a range of experts has convincingly demonstrated that the US prosecution seeks to criminalise the application of ordinary journalistic methods to obtain and publish information that is in the public interest.

 

First, the indictment attempts to portray as criminal the fact that Assange “explicitly solicited (…) restricted material of political, diplomatic or ethical significance.” However, it is well-established in the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights, among other human rights law and jurisprudence, that the gathering of information is an essential preparatory step in journalism and an inherent, protected part of press freedom.

 

In this regard, we concur with Mark Feldstein, Professor of Broadcast Journalism at the University of Maryland and longtime investigative reporter, who in his testimony said that the “Government’s attempt to draw a distinction between passive and active newsgathering – sanctioning the former and punishing the latter – suggests a profound misunderstanding of how journalism works. Good reporters don’t sit around waiting for someone to leak information, they actively solicit it.”

 

Second, the use of technical measures such as those used by Assange to facilitate leaks and protect whistleblowers and other sources is now a staple in investigative reporting, but the indictment portrays these standard journalistic methods as illegal and akin to espionage. The protection of journalistic sources is one of the fundamental and basic conditions for press freedom, which is reflected in international human rights law and jurisprudence as well as professional codes of conduct.

 

ECPMF attempted to observe part of the proceedings remotely but did not receive access to the Crowd Video Platform facility. Others who had been sent details had that access abruptly revoked on the first day of the hearings. Reportedly, District Judge Baraitser said that she is not confident that the integrity of the court could be maintained if members of the public were allowed remote access to the proceedings. She did not at any point distinguish political or civil society observers from members of the general public. Furthermore, we note that observers who were at the court have also expressed frustration at the extensive barriers established for those attempting to monitor the case. Trial monitoring is both the exercise and observation of the fundamental right to a fair and public hearing, allowing for scrutiny of its fairness and protecting against judicial arbitrariness. We are deeply concerned that in a case of such significance the court has failed to live up to the standards of transparency and openness.   

Photo: New Media Days/Peter Erichsen, CC BY-SA 2.0

Read news by categories:

Related news

Statement

Disturbing pattern of violence and harassment at COVID-related protests across Europe

The partners in the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) are highly concerned by a barrage of attacks and harassment of journalists by protesters at demonstrations across Europe in recent weeks against new government measures taken in light of the Coronavirus-pandemic.

READ MORE
Statement

Poland: Stronger U.S. and EU action required over ‘lex TVN’

The Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) today calls for swift and robust action by the European Union and U.S. to defend media freedom in Poland and counter the serious attack on the independence of the country’s largest private television channel TVN by the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party.

READ MORE
Statement

Daphne Caruana Galizia: Landmark Public Inquiry recommendations must be implemented

On 29 July 2021, the landmark Public Inquiry into the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia published its conclusions, finding that “the State has to shoulder responsibility for the assassination because it created an atmosphere of impunity, generated from the highest levels in the heart of the administration of the Office of the Prime Minister and like an octopus spread to other entities like regulatory institutions and the police, leading to the collapse of the rule of law.

READ MORE
Grants

“A signal of encouragement” to Belarus

The Belarusian journalists Katsyaryna Bahvalava and Darya Chultsova will be awarded the Prize for the Freedom and Future of the Media 2021

READ MORE
Monitor

147 alerts in 4 months – third MFRR Monitoring Report reveals alarming media freedom trends

The end of 2020 and beginning of 2021 were not easy on press and media freedom, the third MFRR Monitoring Report shows.

READ MORE
Statement

EU Rule of Law report: Little bark, no bite

On 20 July, the European Commission published the 2021 Rule of Law Report. The document can be a valuable tool that empowers civil society, the EU institutions and Member State governments who care about the rule of law in the Union. However, for it to live up to the high expectations and truly become a critical tool that can contribute to the promotion and safeguarding of EU values, we believe several fundamental changes are needed in future iterations of the report.

READ MORE