Julian Assange Extradition
ECPMF calls on the UK to release Julian Assange and block his extradition

ECPMF

30 September 2020

No Comments

Julian Assange Extradition

Julian Assange Extradition

ECPMF calls on the UK to release Assange and block his extradition, as the hearings enter the final stretch. We are gravely concerned about the implications of the US government’s indictment for investigative journalism.

 

The European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) is deeply concerned by the ongoing extradition proceedings brought against Julian Assange in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court. We reiterate our call on the UK Government to release him without further delay and to block his extradition to the US.

 

The US Government’s indictment of Assange represents the first-ever use of charges under the Espionage Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for the publication of truthful information in the public interest. The precedent established by this case could be damning, opening the door to criminalising the protection of journalist-source communications and the publication by journalists of classified information, activities that are a crucial and routine part of investigative journalism and vitally important in modern democracies.

 

Throughout the proceedings to date, Assange’s defence counsel with the help of witness testimony from a range of experts has convincingly demonstrated that the US prosecution seeks to criminalise the application of ordinary journalistic methods to obtain and publish information that is in the public interest.

 

First, the indictment attempts to portray as criminal the fact that Assange “explicitly solicited (…) restricted material of political, diplomatic or ethical significance.” However, it is well-established in the rulings of the European Court of Human Rights, among other human rights law and jurisprudence, that the gathering of information is an essential preparatory step in journalism and an inherent, protected part of press freedom.

 

In this regard, we concur with Mark Feldstein, Professor of Broadcast Journalism at the University of Maryland and longtime investigative reporter, who in his testimony said that the “Government’s attempt to draw a distinction between passive and active newsgathering – sanctioning the former and punishing the latter – suggests a profound misunderstanding of how journalism works. Good reporters don’t sit around waiting for someone to leak information, they actively solicit it.”

 

Second, the use of technical measures such as those used by Assange to facilitate leaks and protect whistleblowers and other sources is now a staple in investigative reporting, but the indictment portrays these standard journalistic methods as illegal and akin to espionage. The protection of journalistic sources is one of the fundamental and basic conditions for press freedom, which is reflected in international human rights law and jurisprudence as well as professional codes of conduct.

 

ECPMF attempted to observe part of the proceedings remotely but did not receive access to the Crowd Video Platform facility. Others who had been sent details had that access abruptly revoked on the first day of the hearings. Reportedly, District Judge Baraitser said that she is not confident that the integrity of the court could be maintained if members of the public were allowed remote access to the proceedings. She did not at any point distinguish political or civil society observers from members of the general public. Furthermore, we note that observers who were at the court have also expressed frustration at the extensive barriers established for those attempting to monitor the case. Trial monitoring is both the exercise and observation of the fundamental right to a fair and public hearing, allowing for scrutiny of its fairness and protecting against judicial arbitrariness. We are deeply concerned that in a case of such significance the court has failed to live up to the standards of transparency and openness.   

Photo: New Media Days/Peter Erichsen, CC BY-SA 2.0

Read news by categories:

Related news

Statement

Press Release: Decreasing Support for Journalists’ Protection will Undermine Media Freedom in Germany and Europe

The plan for the Saxony Budget 2025/2026 reduces financial support for the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) by two-thirds. This poses a significant threat to the stability of the only European civil society organisation operating within the state. The ECPMF acknowledges the difficulty of navigating a state budget amid economic uncertainty. However, in times when public interest journalism and democratic discourse are under severe pressure – facing economic constraints, pressures, disinformation campaigns, a reduced readership, and attacks from the far-right – a strong protection mechanism and unwavering support for press and media freedom in Saxony, Germany, and Europe is more important than ever.

READ MORE
Statement

Sachsenhaushalt: Schwindende Unterstützung für Medienschaffende schwächt Medienfreiheit in Deutschland und Europa

Der Entwurf des sächsischen Doppelhaushaltes 2025/2026 sieht eine Mittelkürzung von zwei Dritteln für das European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) vor. Sollte der Entwurf verabschiedet werden, stellt dies eine ernsthafte Bedrohung für die Stabilität und Zukunft der Organisation dar. Selbstverständlich sind Sparmaßnahmen angesichts der wirtschaftlichen Lage nachvollziehbar. Jedoch ist eine ungebrochene Unterstützung für den unabhängigen Journalismus gerade dann wichtig, wenn finanzielle Engpässe, Rechtspopulismus und Desinformation die Presse- und Medienfreiheit unter Druck setzen.

READ MORE
Feature

Feindbild Journalist:in 9: Pressefreiheit im Spannungsfeld gesellschaftlicher Krisen

Die neue Feindbild Journalist:in Studie zeigt: Mit 98 Angriffen ist die Gewalt gegen Medienschaffende in Deutschland auf Rekordniveau.

READ MORE
Feature

ECPMF’s take on the EU Democracy Shield: A call to prioritise media resilience and journalists’ protection

ECPMF calls for stronger protection of journalists and media sustainability under the EU Democracy Shield.

READ MORE
Statement

Greece: Total impunity persists on fourth anniversary of Giorgos Karaivaz murder

The international media freedom and journalist organisations today mark the fourth anniversary of the killing of Greek crime reporter Giorgos Karaivaz in April 2021 with a renewed call for justice and an end to ongoing impunity.

READ MORE
ECPMF

Lokaljournalismus unter Druck: Sicherheitsempfinden und Bedrohungserfahrungen von Lokaljournalist:innen in Sachsen und Thüringen

Eine neue Studie von BDZV und ECPMF zeigt: Lokaljournalist:innen in Sachsen und Thüringen sind zunehmend Bedrohungen ausgesetzt. Medienfeindlichkeit, Einschüchterung und strukturelle Herausforderungen gefährden die Pressefreiheit.

READ MORE