Ending Gag Lawsuits in Europe Protecting Democracy and Fundamental Rights

Romania: abusive legal action by former bishop against journalists and outlets in Romania

Civil society coalition concerned about abusive legal action by former bishop against journalists and outlets in Romania

The undersigned civil society organisations are concerned about the legal action taken by a former bishop of the Romanian Orthodox Church against The Centre for Investigative Media (CIM), Dela0.ro and three journalists, in relation to their reporting on alleged sexual abuse. We consider the proceedings have many of the characteristics of a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP) and hope the courts will deal with them swiftly with due respect for European human rights law and standards.

On 2 March 2021, the former bishop filed a tort liability claim and two requests for interim injunctions against media outlets CIM and Dela0.ro, and journalists Ovidiu Vanghele (of CIM) and Vlad Stoicescu and Diana Oncioiu (of Dela0.ro) over a series of articles published on safielumina.ro, a joint project between the outlets. In the articles, the journalists wrote that a number of pupils at an Orthodox Christian high school were sexually abused, involving the then-bishop. The reporting led to a re-opening of criminal investigations against the former bishop. He is currently on trial for the rape of one of his students, who filed a criminal complaint against him. The tort claim, on the basis of Article 1349 of the Romanian Civil Code, is targeting the three journalists. Its object has yet to be communicated to the defendants. The requests for interim injunctions were filed against CIM and one private unrelated company owned by one of the journalists. The former bishop asked for the removal of 13 news stories from all platforms where they were published.

We consider this legal action has many of the hallmarks of a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation (SLAPP). SLAPPs are abusive lawsuits filed by powerful individuals and companies as a means of silencing critical expression. They can take many forms and typically involve long and costly legal procedures or the threat thereof to intimidate and harass journalists, activists and watchdogs into silence. 

This legal action by the former bishop is part of a worrying trend across Europe, in which the powerful, wealthy and thin-skinned use SLAPPs to bully and intimidate public watchdogs to avoid scrutiny and escape accountability. A broad coalition of civil society organisations is calling for new law and standards at the European level to address the problem and enhance protection for critical speech. The European Union, based on its competences in the area of civil procedure, should introduce an Anti-SLAPP Directive with minimum rules to guarantee strong and uniform protection of individuals and organisations. In addition, there is a need for the Council of Europe to adopt a Recommendation, which would cover a broader geographical area and can provide detailed guidance to states as to what human rights standards require from any domestic or regional anti-SLAPP law.

We will continue to closely monitor the proceedings against CIM, Dela0.ro, Vanghele, Oncioiu and Stoicescu.

Signed by:

ActiveWatch

ARTICLE 19 

Blueprint for Free Speech

Center for Independent Journalism

Civil Liberties Union for Europe (Liberties)

European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)

European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)

Free Press Unlimited (FPU)

Greenpeace European Unit

Index on Censorship

IFEX

International Press Institute (IPI)

OBC Transeuropa

Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP)

South East European Network for Profession­alization of Media (SEENPM)

The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation

Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)

This statement is coordinated by the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), an Europe-wide mechanism, which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries. This project provides legal and practical support, public advocacy and information to protect journalists and media workers. The MFRR is organised by an consortium led by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) with ARTICLE 19, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), Free Press Unlimited (FPU), the Institute for Applied Informatics at the University of Leipzig (InfAI), International Press Institute (IPI) and CCI/Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT). The project is co-funded by the European Commission. www.mfrr.eu

Read news by categories:

Related news

Statement

Petition against attacks on Domani newspaper and for media freedom in Italy

Three reporters at Italian newspaper Domani are facing up to 9 years in prison for doing their job.

READ MORE
Statement

Georgia: MFRR partners strongly condemn new attempts to introduce a “foreign agent” law

The undersigned media freedom organisations strongly condemn Georgia’s ruling party's renewed effort to pass a Russian-style foreign agent law.

READ MORE
Statement

Safety and justice: demanding accountability for attacks against journalists in Serbia

Commemorating 25 years since the brutal murder of Serbian journalist Slavko Ćuruvija, media freedom organizations unite to condemn continued impunity in this case.

READ MORE
Threat

Slovakia: Independence of Slovakia’s leading TV news channel must be protected

ECPMF is deeply alarmed by the actions of the Slovak government towards Slovakia's leading commercial broadcaster, TV Markíza.

READ MORE
Statement

CoE’s Recommendation represents a significant milestone in the fight against SLAPPs

CASE welcomes the Council of Europe’s Recommendation on SLAPPs, approved by the Committee of Ministers on Thursday 4 April.

READ MORE
Statement

ECPMF joins call for EU to prioritize rule of law

On Wednesday, ECPMF and 38 other media freedom organisations called on the European Commission to strengthen its fifth annual rule of law report.

READ MORE