Roberta Knoll

13 November 2020

No Comments

A call on UK authorities to intervene on behalf of whistleblower Jonathan Taylor, stuck in Croatia

mfrr logo

This letter was sent electronically to the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs and First Secretary of State, Rt Hon Dominic Raab MP

 

13 November 2020

 

We, the undersigned Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) partners, whistleblowing, human rights and transparency organisations, are concerned that without intervention by the government of the United Kingdom, whistleblower and British citizen Jonathan Taylor may be stuck in Croatia fighting extradition to Monaco for many more months. 

 

On 31 July 2020, Taylor, a whistleblower who disclosed bribery and corrupt practices in the oil and gas industry, was arrested upon his arrival in Croatia for a holiday pursuant to an Interpol Red Notice issued on request of Monaco. On 1 September, a court in Dubrovnik ordered his extradition. However, on 12 October the Supreme Court partially sustained an appeal by Taylor, ruling that, as the extradition concerned a UK national, that country should be afforded the right to request Taylor’s surrender under the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) scheme. If the UK does not seek his surrender, the Supreme Court said, the lower court should rule on the request for extradition by Monaco. On 20 October, the court in Dubrovnik wrote to the UK authorities requesting a statement as to whether it seeks Taylor’s surrender under the EAW, which would be absurd given he is not under investigation in the UK.

 

Previously, the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) has stated that it is unable to act in Taylor’s case, with reference to a policy against interfering in the independent judicial system of a foreign state. Besides seeming disingenuous in light of the Government’s – welcomed – intervention in some other citizens’ cases abroad, this is a decidedly thin argument when there is a risk of an abuse of process and denial of justice, even more so now that the UK has been directly invited by the Croatian courts to make a statement with respect to Taylor’s case. We urge you to step up and intervene on Jonathan Taylor’s behalf, to make it clear to the Croatian Court and Ministry of Justice that the UK is not seeking Taylor’s extradition through a European arrest warrant because he is not under investigation nor should he be; that Jonathan Taylor is a whistleblower and a protected witness in an important corruption case. 

 

In 2014, Taylor blew the whistle on a $275 million international network of bribes paid by his former employer, the oil platform company SBM Offshore, to secure oil contracts around the world. The evidence he provided to the UK Serious Fraud Office, and investigators in Brazil and the Netherlands as well as the FBI and the Department of Justice in the United States, helped ensure SBM Offshore was fined over $800 million. Notwithstanding the evidence of wrongdoing available to the authorities in Monaco, where SBM Offshore is headquartered, the company has never been investigated for wrongdoing in that country. Instead, the Monegasque authorities accepted, and have continued for six years to pursue, a criminal complaint filed in 2014 against Taylor by SBM Offshore accusing him of bribery and corruption. Despite the case being rejected by a Monegasque court two years ago, it was reinstated and earlier this year, Monaco requested an Interpol Red Notice that resulted in Taylor’s arrest at Dubrovnik Airport on 31 July 2020. Released on bail five days later, today Taylor has spent over 3 months in limbo unable to leave the country, forced to fight for his freedom through the Croatian legal system. 

 

We ask that the UK Government intervene on Jonathan Taylor’s behalf now, so he can, at last, come home.

—————————————————-

This letter was coordinated as part of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries. This project provides legal and practical support, public advocacy and information to protect journalists and media workers. The MFRR is organised by a consortium led by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) including ARTICLE 19, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), Free Press Unlimited (FPU), the Institute for Applied Informatics at the University of Leipzig (InfAI), International Press Institute (IPI) and CCI/Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT). The project is co-funded by the European Commission.

Read news by categories:

Related news

Jobs

Journalists-in-Residence Programm-Mitarbeiter*in

READ MORE
Statement

Serbia: New draft media laws represent another step backward for media freedom

The partner organisations of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) today raise the alarm about two draft media laws brought forward by the Serbian government for their lack of compliance with international freedom of expression standards.

READ MORE
Feature

Murdered, surveilled and sued: decisive action needed to protect journalists and salvage press freedom in Greece

Following a mission to Athens, eight international organisations call on the Government and Prime Minister to show political courage and urgently improve the climate for independent journalism and salvaging press freedom in Greece.

READ MORE
Statement

Urgent appeal to European Parliament: Ban spyware against journalists

ECPMF and 79 civil society and journalists' associations are calling on European Parliament to ensure that journalists are completely protected from spyware in the European Media Freedom Act.

READ MORE
Press release

Turkey: Annual international press freedom mission to Ankara, Diyarbakır, and Istanbul

Between 2 and 5 October 2023, five international media freedom organisations will conduct an annual joint press freedom mission to Ankara, Diyarbakır and Istanbul.

READ MORE
Statement

Cyprus: Call for thorough investigations into surveillance of Makarios Drousiotis

We are highly concerned about the alleged surveillance of journalist Makarios Drousiotis, and the lack of prompt, adequate or thorough investigation of the matter.

READ MORE