OPEN LETTER SENT BY EMAIL TO AND POST TO:
Mr. Zelensky, President of Ukraine
OPEN LETTER SENT BY EMAIL TO AND POST TO:
Mr. Zelensky, President of Ukraine
16 February 2021
Dear President Zelensky,
We, the undersigned organisations join our voices to this letter from the Board of Trustees of the Whistleblowing International Network (WIN) to urge your leadership to defend the integrity of the law that protects those who risk their careers to fight corruption and block proposed draft Bill which undermines effective protection for public interest whistleblowing in Ukraine.
In December 2019, Ukraine enacted landmark anti-corruption legislation which included whistleblowing protection provisions which were unsurpassed in their compliance with international best practices principles.
Unfortunately, the Ukrainian Parliament has now adopted amendments in an otherwise positive Bill for reform – Draft Law #3450 – which would effectively remove protection from whistleblowers reporting information within the institutions they are employed. As almost all whistleblowing reports are made initially internally to an employer, these amendments would mean whistleblowers risk being dismissed without legal protection before they can communicate the information to competent public authorities or to the public.
No anti-corruption campaign can be credible or effective without whistleblowing protection. A whistleblower’s testimony is often the ‘life blood’ for the investigation and prevention of wrongdoing, and for democratic accountability. If the law leaves whistleblowers defenceless when they challenge corruption, it undermines public trust and confidence in the legal framework and policies. Ukraine has concluded an Association Agreement with the European Union and included the Euro-Atlantic integration as a value in its Constitution. As we summarise below, the proposed legislative framework is not consistent with the EU Directive on the protection of persons reporting breaches of Union law or basic tenets of international best practices principles for whistleblowing protection. Our specific concerns are as follows:
However, under these new rules, it would not even be safe to report to a Director, as the whistleblower is required to have “conclusive knowledge that the person to whom he/ she reports information was not a party to the corruption.” Establishing such a requirement for protection is unconscionable. Again, it puts the whistleblower’s mind on trial and, by necessitating “conclusive knowledge,” requires more certainty of an assessment of a manager’s innocence than a court needs to convict. The net realistic impact is that there will not be any protection for internal reports.
Further, these amendments would introduce a prerequisite for protection that requires whistleblowers to expose those who may have assisted them. Under this requirement, whistleblowers become a threat to colleagues. This forces colleagues to avoid them which creates isolation which is fatal for those either trying to expose corruption or challenging retaliation. This is why international best practices also protect those associated with whistleblowers. Yet this amendment enables retaliation against those who assist whistleblowers.
These problematic provisions are surprising, as they were added to what was otherwise sensible reform designed to clarify and improve the 2019 law. For example, they would neutralize the benefit of a welcome provision within the Bill to create a unified, secure reporting channel under the National Agency for Corruption Prevention. The Bill also seeks to expand the list of government agencies nominated to receive external whistleblowing disclosures.
The primary advocate for these amendments stated in Parliament that there needed to be a distinction between whistleblowers and Stalinist-era snitches. He disputed the concept that anonymous whistleblowing should be protected. Ironically, his amendments will force whistleblowers to become ‘snitches,’ as they would no longer have the option to address problems internally. To retain their rights, they must now bypass their employer and communicate only with law enforcement, or the public, in the first instance. This will foster increased distrust and retaliation within the workplace. It also denies employers the opportunity to address misconduct within their institutions, without the expense of defending themselves in external law enforcement investigations.
Tom Devine, Legal Director at the Government Accountability Project in Washington DC and WIN Trustee argues,
“The proposed amendments to Ukraine’s legislation are an attack on the basic principles of whistleblowing protection and the spirit of the EU Directive. As experts and organisations committed to whistleblower protection, we would have to warn those seeking our help that this law is a trap for internal disclosures.
Anna Myers, Executive Direction at WIN urges President Zelensky to act.
We hope that you will reject these amendments, block this Bill from becoming law and send it back to the Ukrainian Parliament for improvements which retain the unified, secure whistleblower portal. Whistleblowers are the real-life servants of the people. They need your support.”
As a network of over 40 organisations in 25 countries and numerous partners working to protect whistleblowers in law and practice around the world, WIN’s subject matter experts are available to provide any assistance on assessing Ukraine’s compliance with international best practice principles for whistleblowing legislation and maintaining Ukraine’s international credibility in fighting corruption effectively.
Board of Trustees, Whistleblowing International Network:
John Devitt (Chair of WIN Board), CEO of Transparency International Ireland
Tom Devine, Legal Director, Government Accountability Project, USA
Annegret Falter (Dipl.-Pol.), Chair of Whistleblower-Netzwerk, Germany
Giorgio Fraschini, Whistleblowing Programme Manager of Transparency International Italy
David Hutton, Senior Fellow, Centre for Free Expression Whistleblowing Initiatives, Ryerson
Cathy James, Lawyer Expert in Whistleblowing Law, United Kingdom
Vladimir Radomirović, Editor-in-Chief of, Pištalkja (The Whistle), Serbia
African Centre for Media & Information Literacy (AFRICMIL), Abuja, Nigeria
SpeakOut SpeakUp Ltd (United Kingdom)
Giovanni Pellerano, CTO of GlobaLeaks, Italy
Emmanuel Jacob, President, European Organisation of Military Associations and Trade Unions (EUROMIL)
Anti-Corruption Research and Education Centre (ACREC), Kyiv, Ukraine
Alberto Alemanno, Federico Angheé and Priscilla Robledo, The Good Lobby
Wim Vandekerckhove, Professor of Business Ethics, Centre for Research in Employment and Work (CREW) – University of Greenwich, UK
The Daphne Caruana Galizia Foundation, Malta
Blueprint for Free Speech, Australia
Oživení, Czech Republic
Instituti i Kosoves per Drejtesi/Kosovo Law Institute, Republic of Kosovo
Ehat Miftaraj, Executive Director, Kosovo Law Institute, Kosovo
Protect (United Kingdom)
CHESNO Movement, Kyiv, Ukraine
Institute of Legislative Ideas, Kyiv, Ukraine
Transparency International Estonia
Civil Control Platform, Dnipro, Ukraine
Osservatorio Balcani Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT), Italy
Transparency International Ukraine (TI Ukraine), Ukraine
David Lewis, Professor of Employment Law, Middlesex University. UK
Bihus.Info, Kyiv, Ukraine
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF), Leipzig, Germany
ARTICLE 19, UK
Human Rights House Foundation (HRHF), Norway
Transparency International Italy
Seema Joshi, Director of Campaigns, Global Witness
Free Press Unlimited, the Netherlands
Centre for Free Expression (Canada)
Helen Darbishire, Executive Director, Access Info Europe (Madrid-based),
The Signals Network, Delphine Halgand, Executive Director
Zuzana Grochalová, Project Coordinator, Transparency International Slovakia
Andreas Freimueller, Project Leader SwissLeaks, Campax, Switzerland
Legal Human Academy, Denmark
Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)
The Belarusian journalists Katsyaryna Bahvalava and Darya Chultsova will be awarded the Prize for the Freedom and Future of the Media 2021READ MORE
The end of 2020 and beginning of 2021 were not easy on press and media freedom, the third MFRR Monitoring Report shows.READ MORE
On 20 July, the European Commission published the 2021 Rule of Law Report. The document can be a valuable tool that empowers civil society, the EU institutions and Member State governments who care about the rule of law in the Union. However, for it to live up to the high expectations and truly become a critical tool that can contribute to the promotion and safeguarding of EU values, we believe several fundamental changes are needed in future iterations of the report.READ MORE
The European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) is highly concerned about the raid this morning on the home of investigative journalist Roman Dobrokhotov. We call on the Russian authorities to immediately halt its intensifying crackdown on independent media in the run-up to the legislative elections in September.READ MORE
The Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) and undersigned partner organisations are concerned about and condemn recent statements by Turkish President Erdoğan and other government officials pertaining to the introduction of new regulation of so-called fake news and “foreign-funded” news in the country.READ MORE
The Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) is highly alarmed by the revelations by a consortium led by French NGO Forbidden Stories about the surveillance of journalists, human rights defenders, lawyers and others through the Pegasus spyware program developed by Israeli company NSO Group.READ MORE