Slovenia: proposed changes to public service media raise serious concern by MFRR partners

mfrr logo


Mr. Janez Janša, Prime Minister of the Republic of Slovenia

Mr. Vasko Simoniti, Minister of Culture the Republic of Slovenia

Mr. Borut Pahor, President of the Republic of Slovenia

Mr. Igor Zorčič, Speaker of the National Assembly



We, the undersigned partners of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), would like to raise serious concerns about the proposed changes to the funding of public service media in Slovenia and the unacceptably short amount of time that was allocated for public debate and consultation on the matter, which in the meantime has been extended.


Taken together the package of amendments to three media laws proposed on 9 July have the potential to financially weaken the public broadcaster and allow far greater government control over the management of public service media.


These interconnected changes raise several fundamental questions over the future independence and freedom of the country’s public service media and could lead to major changes to the wider Slovenian media landscape.


The financial forecasts set out by the RTV Slovenia (RTVS) General Manager Igor Kadunc in the wake of the announcement paint an alarming picture. If approved, the changes to the Radio and Television Slovenia Act would result in an overall annual budget reduction of approximately €13 million, leaving the broadcaster in a precarious fiscal position.


To offset these substantial losses, it is clear RTVS will be forced to cut budgets to staff and production costs. According to the trade unions of RTVS, this could result in up to 400 employees losing their jobs, jeopardising its ability to produce the professional and dependable journalism that has been so important during the Covid-19 pandemic.


Equally worrying are the proposals to amend elements of the Slovenian Press Agency Act, which will give the government greater powers to select its supervisors and dismiss its director.


We have and share serious concerns that these proposals could potentially pave the way for political influence and interference over the Agency’s executive body and its editorial policy, resulting in a deterioration in its independence akin to changes observed in other European states.


Unfortunately, the government’s recent move to exert greater control over the RTVS’s Programming Council, and its failed bid to appoint more of its favoured candidates to its Supervisory Board, do little to allay these concerns.


The Ministry of Culture had initially allocated a mere five working days for public debate and consultation on all the proposed legislative amendments. Considering the scope and significance of these changes, this was an inadequate amount of time to conduct a proper public debate into the future of the public broadcaster with all relevant stakeholders. In the meantime the public consultation period has been extended until the end of August.


We welcome this change, which we hope will be adequate to allow the public, journalists, media associations, civil society, and parliament itself to consider the ramifications of the proposals. We urge Minister of Culture Vasko Simoniti and the coalition led by the ruling Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS) to engage substantively with the consultation process with a view toward ensuring that draft amendments reflect key concerns raised by expert stakeholders.


These draft changes, and the apparent attempt to rush them through parliament, have been preceded by a clear efforts during the last few months by certain public officials, including the Prime Minister, to attack critical journalism and discredit and undermine public trust in the work of the broadcaster and its staff.


Set against this backdrop, we are concerned that these proposed amendments are part of a wider politically motivated attack on RTVS by members of the ruling SDS party, one based on accusations of perceived bias rather than sound financial management of a public body.


This is entirely inconsistent with international standards and the values of media freedom and independence to which Slovenia is bound by the European Union.


The MFRR will continue to closely monitor this situation in Slovenia in the coming days and months and plans to hold a special press freedom mission to the country later in the year to engage with relevant stakeholders.


We urge the coalition government to apply the brakes to this legislative package, at the very least pending extensive further consultation and substantial revisions. It is clear that major changes to these proposals are needed to safeguard the independence and public-interest reporting of public service media in Slovenia.




European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF)

European Federation of Journalists (EFJ)

Free Press Unlimited

International Press Institute (IPI)

Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT)

This statement was prepared by the International Press Institute (IPI) as part of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a mechanism which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries. This project provides legal and practical support, public advocacy and information to protect journalists and media workers. The MFRR is organised by an consortium led by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) including ARTICLE 19, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), Free Press Unlimited (FPU), the Institute for Applied Informatics at the University of Leipzig (InfAI), International Press Institute (IPI) and CCI/Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT). The project is co-funded by the European Commission.

ipi as part of mfrr

Read news by categories:

Related news


Leading editors, lawyers, journalists, publishers, and other experts call on the UK Government to back anti-SLAPP protections to defend media freedom

A model anti-SLAPP Law drafted on behalf of the UK Anti-SLAPP Coalition was sent to the Secretary of State for Justice, Dominic Raab.


“The evidence of crimes done by the Russian forces will become the textbook of Ukraine’s recent history” – Interview with a Ukrainian Journalist in Residence.

As part of our ongoing series of interviews with JiR fellows, we interviewed a Ukrainian journalist who is now in exile in Leipzig.


Slovenia: Media freedom groups back legislative efforts to depoliticise public media

Reform aimed at limiting political interference over RTV SLO faces upcoming referendum challenge.


Albania: Media pluralism and transparency concerns fuel deterioration in media freedom

Following a two-day fact-finding mission to Tirana on 17-18 November 2022, the partners of the Council of Europe’s Platform on Safety of Journalists today publish their findings on press freedom, media pluralism and the safety of journalists in Albania.


Italy: a call of support for Roberto Saviano, defendant in a defamation trial

Members of the Coalition Against SLAPPs in Europe (CASE), with the support of the coalition’s Italian group and Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), express solidarity with Roberto Saviano who attended the first hearing in the proceedings for aggravated defamation initiated against him by current Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.


Bulgarian far-right party’s ‘foreign agent’ bill sparks media freedom concerns

Press freedom groups raise alarm that Bulgarian Foreign Agent law appears intended to target critical media.