ECPMF

22 June 2021

No Comments

SLAPPed but not silenced – First global analysis of SLAPPs provided by Business & Human Rights Ressource Centre

In June 2021, Business & Human Rights Ressource Centre launched a report analysing the use of SLAPPs globally: “SLAPPed but not silenced: Defending human rights in the face of legal risks”. The full briefing is available in English and Spanish and the Executive Summary is available in French.

This research builds upon the vital work and research of many human rights defenders and civil society coalitions, including Asina LoyikoCoalition Against SLAPPs in EuropeOn ne se taira pas, and Protect the Protest, to stop the use of SLAPPs.

This first-ever global analysis of lawsuits which bear the hallmarks of SLAPPs brought or initiated by business actors reveals that powerful entities are abusing legal systems across the world to intimidate and silence defenders and communities who speak out against corporate abuse. 

Key findings

  • We identified 355 cases that cases that bear the hallmarks of SLAPPs brought or initiated by business actors since 2015 against individuals and groups related to their defense of human rights and/or the environment. This figure is likely to be the tip of the iceberg, recognizing the time-specific nature of our research scope and the challenges of identifying SLAPPs and directly linking them to the companies involved. 
  • We identified 106 companies and businesspeople involved in bringing or initiating these cases. At least 11 of these companies were repeat offenders, having been involved in more than one judicial proceeding. These included: Thammakaset (Thailand), Inversiones Los Pinares (Honduras), MMG Limited Las Bambas (Peru), and Lydian Armenia (Armenia).  
  • The highest number of SLAPPs took place in Latin America (39%), followed by Asia and the Pacific (25%), Europe & Central Asia (18%), North America (9%), Africa (8.5%), and MENA (0.5 %). Nearly three-quarters (73%) of cases were brought in countries in the Global South. 
  • 63% of cases involved criminal charges. 
  • Most individuals and groups facing SLAPPs (65% of cases) raised concerns about projects in four sectors: mining (108), agriculture and livestock (76), logging and lumber (29), and palm oil (20). 
  • The amount of damages sought by those filing SLAPPs in just 82 of the cases totalled to over 1.5 billion USD (information on damages sought was not available publicly for the remaining cases).   

In addition to our briefing, we have also launched:

  • database of 150+ cases the bear the hallmarks of SLAPPs
  • New SLAPP portal on our website with relevant resources
  • Eleven videos from HRDs, NGO representatives, and policymakers sharing their insights about SLAPPs
  • Blog piece: Fighting back against the use of litigation to quash dissent”

We are very grateful to the individuals, organizations, and coalitions who shared their stories, expertise, and insights as part of this research. 

The Investor Alliance for Human Rights also released a statement  signed by 44 investors representing $270 billion assets under management calling on companies to take broad, systemic action to protect human rights defenders, and immediate action to ensure that they do not use or support SLAPPs against individuals, organizations, or communities who peacefully promote or protect human rights and the environment. 

Read news by categories:

Related news

Statement

Czechia: Media freedom groups urge Czechia’s government to uphold public media’s independence

As Czechia’s new government prepares to reshape the funding and governance of its public broadcasters, press freedom groups caution that replacing the licence fee with state budget funding would expose ČT and ČRo to political pressure and weaken the editorial independence guaranteed under EU law.

READ MORE
Statement

Position Paper: Transnational Repression against Journalists in Exile

Transnational repression (TNR), the cross-border targeting, intimidation, and harassment of journalists and human rights defenders, is increasingly undermining press freedom and human rights in Europe and beyond. Journalists in exile often remain subjects of sustained threats, surveillance, cyber-attacks, psychological pressure, and harassment long after reaching presumed safety. These tactics are used by authoritarian states to silence dissent, extend their reach beyond borders, and weaken the role of independent media globally.

READ MORE
Statement

EU’s dangerous ‘Return Hubs’ policy: A threat to journalists in exile

The EU’s new “Return Hubs” migration policy endangers journalists and human rights defenders in exile by designating unsafe countries as “safe,” undermining press freedom and EU human rights commitments.

READ MORE
Statement

Open letter to Croatian Prime Minister Plenković: MFRR raises alarm over unlawful political pressure against weekly Novosti

Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) consortium, expresses grave concern regarding recent statements by the Homeland Movement that targeted the weekly newspaper Novosti, the only print media for the Serb minority in Croatia.

READ MORE
Statement

Lithuania: Media freedom groups raise alarm as political pressure campaign on LRT widens

READ MORE
Statement

Ukraine: Peace plan must ensure accountability for crimes against journalists

As negotiations continue over a peace plan to end the Russian war on Ukraine, Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) and partner organisations strongly oppose any proposals on granting amnesty for potential war crimes committed in the course of Russia’s full-scale invasion, especially for those against journalists.

READ MORE
Tags :