MFRR partners: "The Slovenian government must stop interfering in the work of public service media"

ECPMF

07 December 2020

No Comments

MFRR partners raise serious concerns over suspension of funding to Slovenian Press Agency

The undersigned partners of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) today raise serious concerns over the recent decision by the Government Communication Office (UKOM) in Slovenia to suspend financing of the country’s press agency.

 

We believe the move to temporarily halt funding from the Slovenian Press Agency (STA) will seriously jeopardise its ability to keep citizens informed during and after the COVID-19 pandemic and is the latest example of a wider effort by the current administration to undermine and stigmatise the country’s public service media.

 

On November 30, UKOM director Uroš Urbanija communicated to the government that it had been unable to implement the contract with the STA with the justification that the agency had not responded to repeated requests to provide information which would be used to assess its funding for 2021.

 

In response, the STA director Bojan Veselinovič has claimed there is no legal basis for the suspension and accused the government office of exceeding its mandate by interfering with its editorial autonomy, warning that the withdrawal of funding threatened its operational stability.

 

The ongoing contractual dispute primarily centres around whether UKOM has the legal right to request documents, information and databases related to the agency’s commercial activity, which the STA argues can only be requested by the government itself. The government has not yet made a decision on the termination of the STA’s funding.

 

In light of these developments, the MFRR calls on the coalition government of Prime Minister Janez Janša to ensure that the decision to suspend financing is immediately reversed and that and that suspended monthly payments are disbursed retroactively. The STA is too important a part of the Slovenia media landscape to be rendered unoperational.

 

We note that there has been a broad response from journalists’ associations, trade unions, the STA’s Supervisory Committee, industry groups and government coalition partners for reversing the suspension. We also support calls for an urgent debate to be held in the National Assembly in the coming days to establish why greater safeguards weren’t put in place to stop the dispute reaching this point.

 

A compromise-seeking approach here is essential. A dialogue should be opened between the STA and the government to resolve the disputes while legal debates are underway. If it pushes ahead with this controversial decision, the government would again be rushing decisions that would fundamentally alter the country’s media landscape without proper consultation.

 

Ultimately, however, we believe this dispute goes far beyond procedure into politics. The willingness of the UKOM to cut funding appears to reflect the ruling party’s wider policy of opposition towards the country’s public service media, one driven by personal grievances and justified through unfair accusations of institutional bias.

 

As such, it fits a clear pattern in the current administration of weakening and undermining media which it sees as oppositional while also exerting greater control over the country’s public service media.

 

At the same time as withdrawing funding from the agency, the government is also seeking to amend the Slovenian Press Agency Act to give it greater powers to select its supervisors and dismiss its director. This comes against a wider backdrop of proposed legislative changes which would financially weaken the public broadcaster, RTVSLO.

 

Meanwhile, our organisations have watched closely as public officials, including the prime minister himself, continued their attempts to discredit and undercut public trust in the work of the STA and the RTVSLO in recent months. These unjustified attacks are undermining Slovenia’s international reputation of a country with high levels of media freedom.

 

Going forward, the Slovenian government must stop interfering in the work of public service media and ensure long-term and stable financial stability for both the STA and RTVSLO. Both must be able to carry out their mandates to provide high-quality and professional reporting without interference, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

It is also increasingly clear that efforts must be made to depoliticise the work of the Government Communication Office, which as we have seen already this year, has been accused of acting more like an arm of the ruling party rather than of the coalition government.

 

The MFRR will continue to closely monitor this situation in Slovenia in the coming weeks and is committed to holding a special press freedom mission to the country later within the coming months. We have no doubt the funding of the STA will be high on the agenda when it is.

This statement is part of the Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR), a Europe-wide mechanism, which tracks, monitors and responds to violations of press and media freedom in EU Member States and Candidate Countries. This project provides legal and practical support, public advocacy and information to protect journalists and media workers. The MFRR is organised by an consortium led by the European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF) with ARTICLE 19, the European Federation of Journalists (EFJ), Free Press Unlimited (FPU), the Institute for Applied Informatics at the University of Leipzig (InfAI), International Press Institute (IPI) and CCI/Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa (OBCT). The project is co-funded by the European Commission. www.mfrr.eu

Read news by categories:

Related news

Statement

Czechia: Media freedom groups urge Czechia’s government to uphold public media’s independence

As Czechia’s new government prepares to reshape the funding and governance of its public broadcasters, press freedom groups caution that replacing the licence fee with state budget funding would expose ČT and ČRo to political pressure and weaken the editorial independence guaranteed under EU law.

READ MORE
Statement

Position Paper: Transnational Repression against Journalists in Exile

Transnational repression (TNR), the cross-border targeting, intimidation, and harassment of journalists and human rights defenders, is increasingly undermining press freedom and human rights in Europe and beyond. Journalists in exile often remain subjects of sustained threats, surveillance, cyber-attacks, psychological pressure, and harassment long after reaching presumed safety. These tactics are used by authoritarian states to silence dissent, extend their reach beyond borders, and weaken the role of independent media globally.

READ MORE
Statement

EU’s dangerous ‘Return Hubs’ policy: A threat to journalists in exile

The EU’s new “Return Hubs” migration policy endangers journalists and human rights defenders in exile by designating unsafe countries as “safe,” undermining press freedom and EU human rights commitments.

READ MORE
Statement

Open letter to Croatian Prime Minister Plenković: MFRR raises alarm over unlawful political pressure against weekly Novosti

Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) consortium, expresses grave concern regarding recent statements by the Homeland Movement that targeted the weekly newspaper Novosti, the only print media for the Serb minority in Croatia.

READ MORE
Statement

Lithuania: Media freedom groups raise alarm as political pressure campaign on LRT widens

READ MORE
Statement

Ukraine: Peace plan must ensure accountability for crimes against journalists

As negotiations continue over a peace plan to end the Russian war on Ukraine, Media Freedom Rapid Response (MFRR) and partner organisations strongly oppose any proposals on granting amnesty for potential war crimes committed in the course of Russia’s full-scale invasion, especially for those against journalists.

READ MORE
Tags :